Why More Families Are Ditching the Courtroom in Divorce Cases
Breaking up may never be painless, but it’s becoming far less public, expensive, and combative—especially for separating couples in England and Wales. With recent reforms reshaping family law, more people are stepping away from traditional litigation and leaning into non-court options to settle divorce and custody matters.
What started as a shift with the 2022 no-fault divorce law has now evolved into a wider movement embracing alternative resolution paths that prioritize privacy, speed, and flexibility.
A Look at What’s Changing in Family Disputes
In April 2024, updates to the Family Procedure Rules pushed courts to actively encourage non-court dispute resolution (NCDR). The goal? Reduce courtroom battles and help families find faster, more private solutions.
And it’s working—divorces, especially those involving children or financial arrangements, are increasingly handled outside the courtroom.

Pexels | Kaboompics.com | No-fault divorce and private mediation give couples more peaceful ways to move forward.
According to law firm Kingsley Napley, nearly 90% of its family law cases last year were resolved through private processes. That’s a dramatic jump from just a few years ago.
This shift is largely due to a broader definition of what NCDR now includes:
1. Mediation
2. Collaborative Law
3. Neutral Evaluation
4. Arbitration
These options offer structure and flexibility without dragging families through the stress of litigation.
Mediation: Still the First Step for Many
Mediation continues to be the most common starting point. It involves a neutral, trained mediator who guides couples through discussions to resolve issues on their own terms. It’s private, cost-effective, and can help reduce emotional strain, especially for families with children.
There are variations, too. Hybrid mediation allows the mediator to speak privately with each party if negotiations stall, offering more adaptability than the standard model. Confidentiality remains a key feature, and external professionals—like financial advisors or child specialists—can be brought in when needed.
That said, mediation isn’t always one-size-fits-all. It’s ideal for straightforward separations, but when things get complex, other NCDR methods often step in.
When Mediation Isn’t Enough
If mediation reaches a dead end, couples can consider collaborative law. In this approach, both sides work with specially trained attorneys during a series of meetings. Everyone commits to resolving matters without going to court—if talks fail, the lawyers withdraw from the case. This creates an incentive to find a middle ground.
Another method gaining popularity is early neutral evaluation or private FDR (Financial Dispute Resolution). A neutral expert gives a non-binding opinion on likely court outcomes, helping both parties assess where they stand. It’s especially useful for complex financial negotiations.
Then there’s arbitration, which resembles a court hearing but happens privately. A mutually agreed-upon judge hears the case and issues a legally binding decision, often on the same day. It offers privacy, efficiency, and control over who decides the outcome, making it a favorite among high-net-worth couples.
The Appeal for High-Profile and Wealthy Clients
Arbitration is particularly appealing for those in the public eye. Since January 2024, journalists can attend certain private family court hearings. For celebrities and wealthy individuals, this brings an added risk of media exposure. NCDR offers a way to keep proceedings discreet.
There’s also the ability to choose a judge with specific expertise. That means fewer surprises and a higher chance of a fair outcome. In many cases, the entire process—from start to resolution—takes just weeks, instead of the typical 18-month court timeline.
For example, in the case of “Shiv and Tom” from “Succession”, arbitration would’ve likely saved a lot of screen time and stress.
Where Non-Court Solutions Reach Their Limits

Pexels | Pavel Danilyuk | Non-court methods offer speed but can’t ensure the transparency of court orders.
While non-court approaches offer flexibility and speed, they aren’t always the best fit. Some disputes involve power imbalances or hidden assets, making transparency a concern. In court, judges can order disclosure and valuations. Outside of it, that authority doesn’t exist.
If one partner is financially savvy and the other isn’t, NCDR can unintentionally tip the scales. In these cases, court intervention remains essential to ensure fairness and accountability.
Legal experts note that the effectiveness of NCDR often relies on the experience and judgment of the legal team guiding the process. And as fewer cases go to court, fewer legal precedents are set—potentially slowing the evolution of family law itself.
The Direction Family Law Is Heading
Non-court options are quickly becoming the norm. Even complex cases can be resolved outside the courtroom, provided the right professionals are involved. Hybrid mediation, collaborative law, and arbitration all offer tailored solutions with less emotional toll.
Recent research by the Family Mediation Council (FMC) shows that while many people know mediation is an option, they often delay action. The focus now is on encouraging more couples to take that first step and consider a non-court solution before anything else.
With more families seeing the benefits and reforms backing the shift, non-court resolution is not just a trend—it’s a smarter, more human-centered way to handle separation.
The rise of non-court dispute resolution is reshaping how families navigate divorce. By offering speed, privacy, and tailored solutions, NCDR is helping couples avoid unnecessary battles and make decisions that prioritize dignity and respect.
While not flawless, its growing influence signals a meaningful change in the way family law is practiced—and understood.